I am doing my PhD in Digital Humanities on Linked Open Usable Data, with a focus on its (potential) use in the Humanities and the perspectives it could bring in terms of semantics and interoperability. My research is grounded as part of the Participatory Knowledge Practices in Analogue and Digital Image Archives (PIA) research project, which aims to develop a Citizen Science platform around three photographic collections of the Swiss Society for Folklore Studies (SSFS).
Some of the methods that I leverage for my PhD thesis... Linked Art is an RDF application of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model using JSON-LD and the Getty vocabularies to describe cultural heritage objects and it's also a dedicated community.
"Through and beyond an ANT lens" - ANT is the foundation of the theoretical framework of my PhD thesis. A three step-process: Recognising that non-Humans have agency: this principle allowed for more open stories to be told Assembling the Collective: the collective can be degined as an expansion of nature and society. To assemble this, we need to unfold the Differing Cosmos of Actors, for example by mapping what Latour called "dependencies" and finding out the "controversies" in a given network full of intermediaries and mediators. Mediators are those that generate traceable associations. Translation process: naming those associations. A Relation or association in ANT does not transport causality but induces two mediators into coexisting
"Summarising formal associations. Assemblages are relational. "
79 participants from 20 countries — 23 :us:, 12 :switzerland:, 9 :gb:, 7 :fr:, 6 :de:, 3 :belgium:/:ireland:, 2 :brazil:/:canada:/:mexico: Gender identification: 50 Males (63.3%), 26 Females (32.9%), 3 Prefer not to say (3.8%)
1) Belonging to a given commnity - before 2011 2) People that have been active prior to 2021 tend to be more active
Participants frequently uses a combination of tools, such as image viewers (Mirador, UV), validators, documentation resources, and community platforms (Slack, GitHub). The IIIF specifications website, IIIF Awesome, and various training materials were also mentioned as valuable resources. The range of tools and services mentioned reflects the diverse needs and interests of the IIIF community. Also it marks all the dependecies.
- The IIIF community's success stems from its inclusive and collaborative nature, the availability of interoperable APIs and compatible implementations, its openness and friendliness, and its commitment to providing resources and addressing specific needs. - participants praised the IIIF community for its welcoming and generous attitude, successful implementation of the standard, and effective management structure.
Time constraints emerged as the primary barrier, with some participants (11) expressing a lack of time to engage more actively. The technical nature of IIIF was also mentioned as a barrier, with some individuals finding it challenging to grasp the terminology and complexities quickly. Limited technical knowledge and the steep learning curve were cited as additional obstacles to entry (6). Some participants highlighted the importance of in-person meetings for community building and specification development but noted the high costs associated with organising and attending such events (2). Lack of support from employers beyond a certain point and the perception of community work as separate from job responsibilities were mentioned as barriers to deeper involvement (3). Suggestions for improvement included better communication, emphasis on accessibility, and simpler implementation methods. - Multiple dependencies
Based on the responses from 52 participants, it is evident that IIIF is recognised as a valuable tool in various contexts. A majority of participants (33) agree or strongly agree that IIIF is essential to Open Science, helps with Citizen Science initiatives (39), and contributes to the findability (45), accessibility (37), and reusability (47) aspects of the FAIR principles. While the number of participants is significant, further exploration is needed to fully understand the extent of IIIF’s alignment with the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance
- Both communities prioritise usability and the creation of usable linked data (or Linked Open Usable Data), with a shared emphasis on the adoption of APIs - There is recognition of the common involvement of individuals who play a significant role in both initiatives. - They share a collaborative approach to standards, development, and meetings, fostering a culture of community-led work and shared knowledge. - IIIF has expanded beyond cultural heritage, branching out into other areas due to its generic and applicable technology. In contrast, Linked Art remains primarily focused on art-related objects, catering to a smaller audience.
Advocacy and Leadership: The interviews conducted within the launch of the LUX platform have yielded valuable insights that could potentially serve as a model or framework for similar contexts, despite not being directly related to IIIF.